Nothing here says anything about being a hunter.let that sink in.the next time someone says that and wants to restrict your freedom to own a gun!
@daneldwinbrooks8444 Says:
You do realize that when a comma is used that stands for (and) - (or)
@zoso73 Says:
My Cuban refugee dad would say: if Cuban citizens had a right to bear arms in Cuba, Fidel Castro and the communists would have had no chance to seize control of the government and rule the island the last 60+ years.
@grob25 Says:
You will never read the headline "Faithful Patriot defends his rights from tyranny" Instead, the headline will be "Crazy man shoots local cop" Politicians know they don't have to enforce the laws, which is why they are so bold and brave in suggesting them. Libtards have some sick sense of safety that I will never understand.
@sanborns Says:
Amen ...
@carlthecaveman Says:
No, the American citizen doesn't have a constitutional right to own a gun. We have a God given right to own a gun and a constitutional right to not have the government try to infringe on that God given right.
@13BGunBunny Says:
The Second Amendment does not grant We The People the right to bear arms.
The Second Amendment denies the Government any authority to infringe upon We The People's God given right to bear arms.
@ryaj2356 Says:
Frankly, every American, even felons, should have their rights to everything restored to them given they didn’t abuse that said right. Every citizen should be allowed to defend themselves against the government.
@martinpay3812 Says:
As a Brit, and irrespective of your written constitution, I just find Americans’ fetish over guns strange, disturbing and utterly… weird. Yeah, that’s the word. Weird.
@JESUSisLORD24151 Says:
You can school a fool all you want but you will never get anywhere.
@uprebel5150 Says:
Remember Tom Selleck destroying Rosie O’Donnel on her own show? Just as awesome as this 🇺🇸
@paulkurilecz4209 Says:
Just what do you think keeps the militia well regulated?
@scottfranco1962 Says:
The order of amendments is also pretty key here. The first amendment, right of free speech, is pretty important. That the founders then turned to the right to bear arms right after that indicates their idea of importance. Its also because those were the very key rights the crown tried to take from the colonies.
@CR3W1SH03S Says:
I've been saying this for years. A free state isn't a geographic description. It is a condition of being.
@dancrea9407 Says:
Many state constitutions, the majority in fact, reaffirm this as an individual right as well. Massachusetts, the oldest state constitution, says "The people have a right to keep and to bear arms for the common defence." And the youngest state constitution, Rhode Island, says "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
@petertimmins6657 Says:
The 2A does NOT grant us the right to own arms. It restricts the government from infringing on this natural, meaning God given, right. It is a natural right because it is needed to ensure we are free to pursue our other natural rights.
@Mike590A1 Says:
Look up quotes by the founders on firearms, it's CRYSTAL CLEAR!
George Washington got some zingers that would make most dems throw up😂😂
@concerned1313 Says:
WOW, you teach at UCLA, a rose in a desert of Liberalism!
@timmartin6410 Says:
“The federal government has no authority whatsoever under the Constitution—even if the Second Amendment were repealed—to ban or regulate handguns, high-caliber guns, shotguns, sawed-off shotguns, rifles, assault rifles, extended-capacity magazines, triggers, bump stocks, ammunition, automatic weapons, machine guns, grenades, or bazookas.
And neither does the federal government have any authority whatsoever under the Constitution to establish or mandate gun-free zones, background checks, waiting periods, trigger locks, limits on gun purchases, age restrictions on gun purchases, gun-barrel lengths, concealed weapons laws, licensing of gun dealers, gun-owner databases, gun licensing, or gun registration.
If anything should be repealed it is all federal gun laws—even the ones supported by Republicans and conservatives.”
@FractalPrism. Says:
i came to this vid to see kurt russel "school the view"
not for someone else to yap abt the issue
@PowuhToSeven Says:
Bro this was just you using the view and Kurt just to fool people into listening to you instead. What schooling did he do? You took 80% of the video just for you get the fk off my recommended.
@JeffreyWilstone Says:
Eff the V
@Cucumberflavoredmustard Says:
Why would Kurt defile himself with this environment?
@debbylou5729 Says:
A militia is of the people, NOT one overseen by the government
@name-vi6fs Says:
Those Supreme Court judges pretending the federalist papers dont exist.
@egillis214 Says:
We just overthrew an oppressive government. A British one, with the strongest military in the world. Only taking orders from a tyrant.
The 2nd amendment guarantees protection from the NEXT despot or those trying to corrupt our elections, borders or attempts of a military coup.
Citizen warriors guard our rights. You can’t remove us, out vote us nor control us. We the People have the power.
@charlescarmichael1124 Says:
The second amendment secure or grants NOTHING. It restricts the government from infringing on PREEXISTING rights
@joelafives Says:
I submit that the first 10 amendments can never be reversed. To do so would invalidate the entire Constitution since it was the promise of the Bill of Rights that caused many states to ratify the Constitution initially.
@crawdad4823 Says:
Snake! LOVE that guy!
@zohan90210 Says:
the worst crimes committed against humanity have been carried out by governments against their own people
@Larry660 Says:
2:25: USC Title 10 STILL defines the militia as all males18-45 who are not serving in the active military, and women who are members of the national guard. Those in this group that are in the national guard are the organized militia, those who are not are in the unorganized militia.
@independentpatriot1775 Says:
…“,being necessary to the security of a free state,”… that’s where people get confused. It doesn’t refer to a state being free to protect itself, but rather the people’s authority to maintain a free state.
The United States of America ARE NOT a country, but a UNION of 50 republics…
@davisbwaddell Says:
You did well breaking down the rest of the wording of the ammendment. However, you stopped short of the last part, "shall not be infringed".
@Matticus289 Says:
Alarm bells always go off for me when someone talks about rights, especially ones that include "shall not be infringed", and then says "but". "But that doesn't mean it's unlimited"...ok, what does that mean? Opponents of the 2A will use that terminology to strip you of any meaningful right you have left. If your "right" isn't unlimited, you have no rights
@cantumason4o Says:
I knew Meathead was wrong.
@iamstewpead Says:
A fair government that is concerned for their people, would not be worried about gun ownership. On the other hand, a corrupt government would only be very concerned for themselves!
@Yurkevich22 Says:
It would be great to include in the video what "well-regulated" meant at the time.
@Someguydontknow Says:
I think it should be a human right to bear arms not just for american citizens but the world.
@robertmiller6444 Says:
Until human behavior of a willingness and desire of people in a government to impose authoritarianism, tyranny, and oppression, become "outdated", the Second Amendment is not "outdated". That willingness and desire is as strong as ever in humanity, therefore the Second Amendment is as important and relevant as ever.
@seangriffin2053 Says:
Gun control doesn't work. Ask Chicago, Philadelphia, and Baltimore.
@billjohnson4626 Says:
Thank you
@andrewsadowski6007 Says:
The militia is necessary for a free state, a militia is comprised of the people. The people need to be armed, so they can form a militia if it becomes necessary to defend their state of freedom. Presumably from the government, which requires the govt to not be in control of the arms in which the people will use to defend themselves, hence the shall not be infringed
@sergiodelvecchio1294 Says:
I will never trust a politician, especially the ones who want to take away from the constitution.
@maximusaugustus6823 Says:
Democrats are trying so hard to abolish the 2nd amendment.
@Nordic_Sky Says:
Progressives don't analyze the text to determine what the law means. They decide on an outcome they want (no guns), and then seek to interpret the text to support that view. If the text doesn't support that view? Well, change it then. That's how they operate.
@yootoobvyooer Says:
2A in practice: right to beg the government to conduct background check for you to incriminate yourself shall not be infringed, but you have no right to firearms.
@DoubleplusUngoodthinkful Says:
I disagree that freedom of speech is regulated reasonably. Free speech is absolute. ANY "regulation" on free speech is unconstitutional, just like any infringements on the Second Amendment.
@hobbyking5364 Says:
Kurt Russell is on point1!
@taghkrell Says:
Our constitution (Argentinian constitution) was based on yours, our founding fathers used yours as a model/template, we were one of the richest countries in the world by 1830s/40s until politicians started reformation movements and started "deforming" it, and now here we are... cherish and protect your conitution, do not think what happened to us won't happen to you, not by a second, every cuban and Venezuelan thought that...
LATEST COMMENTS