<<@benharrison1069 says : Free speech always!!! Big tech is a PLATFORM, not a policeman, for free speech.. It is up to the reader/listener to determine for themselves what is truth and what is not truth. If you do not allow that FOR EVERYONE, you do not have free speech.>> <<@ScottStokes-y2d says : It’s not big tech, it’s your politicians. Your democrat politicians.>> <<@XmonkeyzX says : Freedom of speech gives you the right to say what you want yes, but it doesnt mean you wont face the consequences of what you say. Its freedom of speech, not freedom of speech without reprecussions.>> <<@Stahlgewitter says : UNLESS a person spreading "misinformation" about Israel...right?>> <<@paulbingville6485 says : The 1st Amendment only protects against government censorship. Private businesses can regulate what's acceptable on their property. Newspapers and magazines do not have to publish an ad, or letter to the editor, they find objectionable, publishing houses can choose what books they publish, why should social media platforms be treated differently?>> <<@okboomer6201 says : What is the significance of that bracelet that they focused on?>> <<@GUNMETALGUYUSA says : 💯👍🏽🇺🇲🇺🇸>> <<@SharonMatson-i8f says : FREE SPEECH !!!! WHEN THAT GOES AWAY WE ARE IN A DICTATORSHIP PERIOD !!!!!>> <<@keerpuntbelgiekapitalisto5014 says : I'm not scared of big tech. I'm scared of the government regulating speech.>> <<@tenebrousjones4897 says : Yeah, but it’s worked so well that people are gladly censoring themselves. Edit. I had to modify this post for content.>> <<@andybytheway says : They are not private companies. They are corporations. Corporations are publically licensed, publically regulated, publically traded, often publically funded and work hand-in-hand with the governments of the world. Somehow people continue to point at these immoral organisations and say "See? Capitalism doesn't work!" when they do not fit the basic definition of what capitalism is.>> <<@sabertooth207 says : Big tech Companies shouldn't facilitate speech itsself. What exactly is free speech? When it comes to online posts? Can I make a racist comment?>> <<@Yata69 says : AND, Facebook and everyone, including GOOGLE DOES censor information! GOOGLE, probably the worst!>> <<@houdinis_tea says : Free speech should be protected. Misinformation should not.>> <<@Iforgothowtoflyaplane-c9p says : If they don’t like how big tech companies are censoring their voices why don’t they just start their own tech company that doesn’t censor people’s speech? I’m sure people would love that, it’s one of the many reasons why our country is as great as it is>> <<@NYRM1974 says : YouTube has a problem with free speech. Facebook has a problem with free speech. If my personal views are not in line with their ideology they censor me or they remove my content or my comments.>> <<@tidusfantasy says : Well, remember WWII? Hitler spreading all the misinformation to germans and resulting to millions of jews being executed? Lies have consequences from the wrong people. Look at UK recently, the lie of mis-identifying the killers to be muslim but in fact they are white, resulting to huge social unrest. Should government be there to censor that lie at that time? Your question is not whether government or big companies censoring content, but are they censoring the correct things. That people should debate about.>> <<@ishtarlew598 says : If a social media group doesn't toe the line on speech, like X, Gab, Telegram, then the government weaponizes the law to attack them. When that doesn't work, arrest those posting on them.>> <<@airwards777 says : Yes. All those that say no are Brawndo drinking special (super) kind of stupid / useful idiot sheeple.>> <<@Not-the-only-one says : yes>> <<@johnketchun2816 says : You should be asking Zuckerberg....that question....A LITTLE BIT OF IRONY 🤪>> <<@johngalt5411 says : IMHO anything BIG is a threat to free speech; big tech, big pharma, big government, you name it.>> <<@silverbullet1620 says : Can someone explain why Dennis Prager is now an Atheist?>> <<@BIGBADDIVAS says : Truth Social tried so hard to be Big Tech. The only thing it accomplished was ripping off its investors.>> <<@AsherWolfson says : Now someone just needs to teach the Commonwealth how this applies to Common Law; just because we don't have a Bill of Rights, politicians think it doesn't apply to non-Americans.>> <<@annaisabeltrumpistamaga says : F.. fb>> <<@GodBlessedAmerica says : Big tech is infringing on our constitutional rights because our government is telling them to.>>
VideoPro
>>