<<@markkinder6275 says : I understand what Mr Prager is saying, seems like what he is trying to say, on some level, is do what's for the better good. My father died of alcoholic poisoning, when he was 30 years old, I was 10 when he died, he had rage when he was drunk, and alcohol made him a complete loser, ended up in and out of jail, and destroyed his relationship with my mom. When he was sober he was a different man. He also smoked. I think he would have been a better man, if he smokes marijuana! I also know a man, from Los Angeles, from a rich family, that was part of the mob, however, he wasn't interested in being part of the mob. So he was just plodding through life, with no direction. One day, somebody on the street asked him to get some marijuana from somebody as a favor. So he did. When he got the marijuana for the guy, the guy offered him a hit on his joint. He was already in his twenties, this was his first ever joint. Somehow, the marijuana woke him up, snapped him out of his lack of direction. He went back to his family, and told them to use their money to buy an apartment building, and that he wanted to manage it. So instead of being a kid with no direction, he suddenly became a businessman. Is family got out of the mob business to become huge real estate investors. He managed it all. All because of a joint. I personally don't use it and never have. But I think for some people it works>> <<@thisotheroneguy6 says : This is exciting! Enthusiasm is a tool! God speed you Wonderful people you!!>> <<@StanBurns says : Fossil fuels today fossil fuels tomorrow fossil fuels forever don't be stupid !>> <<@TheAutoChannel says : Unfortunately, this video and its message are nonsense. To begin with, petroleum oil, lignite and bituminous coal, and natural and propane gas are not "fossil fuels." Peat might be considered a fossil fuel, but that's about it, and peat isn't used to power internal combustion engines or electricity generators. Petroleum oil, lignite and bituminous coal, and natural and propane gas are not formed from decayed animals or plants. They are formed from tremendous heat and pressure on minerals. The term "fossil fuels" to describe petroleum oil, lignite and bituminous coal, and natural/propane gas is nothing more than semantic wordplay to give these substances a romantic quality and tone of limited accessibility. The notion of limited accessibility is used to drive up wholesale and retail prices. Now, in and of itself, some hyperbole is not a terrible thing. But when hyperbole is used to cloak deadly causations then it is horribly excessive. The correct term for petroleum oil, lignite and bituminous coals, and natural gas fuels is "abiotic fuels." The claim that these abiotic fuels are responsible for our modern high standard of living, is presumptuously stupid. As I have responded to Alex Epstein on several occasions, "Any accolade due to our high quality of life should be given to the inventions that utilize various fuels...regardless of what those fuels are, not to the fuels themselves, and certainly not to coal or gasoline or petroleum diesel or natural gas. The inventions were all created without consideration to any specific fuel. Internal combustion engines were created before the invention of either gasoline or diesel petroleum fuel." No one ever said, "Oh, thank God gasoline (or diesel fuel) has been invented, now we can invent the automobile." Yes, petroleum oil is used to make many, many things. However, alcohols can also be used for just about everything that petroleum oil is used for. And, by using alcohols instead of petroleum oil, these items can be produced to be easily compostable and even biodegradable. Another great aspect of using alcohol in place of petroleum oil is that the switchover is practically instantaneous. For example, right now, immediately, you could fill your engines' gasoline fuel tanks with an alcohol-based fuel without any engine modifications or conversions. The same is true with using alcohol-based renewable diesel fuel in a diesel engine. Every single internal combustion engine on the road today, regardless of age or manufacturer can use ethanol or methanol. Gases can also be made from alcohol that replace the need for natural gas. Coal-powered electricity generators should be replaced with nuclear power, and for those squeamish about the use of uranium nuclear power, we should use thorium to power the reactors. For those not familiar with "thorium," look it up. Consequently, the use of petroleum oil fuels should be totally eliminated or significantly discontinued. For more information about all of this please read my following reports and essays. I am available at any time to discuss, debate, or fight over everything I have written and said. Marc J. Rauch Exec. Vice President/Co-Publisher THE AUTO CHANNEL The Immorality of Arguing That There's a Moral Case for Fossil Fuels https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2018/02/19/511177-immorality-arguing-that-there-s-moral-case-for-fossil-fuels.html The Moral Case for Internal Combustion Engines Powered By Ethanol https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2019/11/15/748379-moral-case-for-internal-combustion-engines-powered-by-ethanol.html Life As We Might Have Known It: What If Ethanol Was Our Primary Engine Fuel http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2016/03/07/205279-life-as-we-might-have-known-it-imagining-bio-fuel.html The Rise & Fall of General Motors and the Subjugation of the Industrialized World http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2012/04/06/031731-rise-fall-general-motors-and-subjugation-industrialized-world.html The Oil Industry Has Been Poisoning Us For Decades, and They've Always Known It http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2016/07/29/266059-oil-industry-has-been-poisoning-us-for-decades-and-they.html The Hypocrisy of Big Oil https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2017/12/20/478776-hypocrisy-big-oil.html Horrific New Video Identifies Man Who Killed The Most People In History https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2022/04/26/1135429-horrific-new-video-identifies-man-who-killed-most-people-history.html The Real Story On Electric Vehicles https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2021/12/03/1078802-real-story-viability-electric-vehicles.html Debunking the Myth of Man-Made Global Warming https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2009/12/25/459948.html Climate Change? No Matter How You Look At It, ETHANOL IS THE ANSWER! https://www.theautochannel.com/news/2022/05/13/1142815-ipso-facto-using-rauch-ocratic-method-to-understand-global-climate.html>> <<@Louipyaps says : 2:11 so what you’re saying is we should worship fossil fuels.>> <<@vashmatrix5769 says : Plants need more co2 to make more food with less water!!>> <<@NearQuasar says : PragerU conveniently forgot about the 8 million deaths fossil fuel use causes every single year.>> <<@timur6922 says : YouTube blocks a lot of videos . PragerU sued them.>> <<@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc says : Nuclear energy distaste driven by 1960’s real fear of atomic annihilation that has been perpetuated over the decades. Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters TOTALLY due to human error. Fukushima had no right being placed where it was in an earthquake and Tsunami prone place. Stupid decision. Both plants did not have FOOLPROOF systems in place. Nuclear energy is God’s Gift to us, He Made uranium to find and exploit. Like every single thing, all must be used freely and WISELY. Not wrapped in human greed. Nor stupidity.>> <<@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc says : The energy is there. Thank GOD for your perfect planet!>> <<@philipdove1705 says : No such thing as foosil fuel it never existed>> <<@philipdove1705 says : Fossil fuels is most likely an incorrect term there are no such thing a fossil fuel. Oil is a natural creation of earth . They decided to use the term fossil so it would seem like a limited recource and yhey couldchatge you extra. However oil is being created constantly and quickly in the ground. Fossiless fuel is a better term>> <<@jladdyost says : I have but one small quibble with Dennis. Children today are not taught facts instead of values. That would be less harmful than what is happening. They are taught bad values, such as DEI and ESG.>> <<@rizbotube says : Ive seen some people that can smoke weed everyday with very little problems. But I also know a number of people that have been absolutely destroyed by drugs and weed was the gateway.>> <<@GregoryJByrne says : The Mystery of the 7 crossings of our stars magnetic equator Jesus held in his hand not you or CO2 is causing not you or CO2 is causing the the earth's OOrt cloud to increase. These are just the birthing pains of this the millennium of climate change end times due to the Great Year precession of the sun's shadow millennial Alpha/Omega equinoxes when earth's orbits eclipse the electromagnetic gravitational equator of the Sun's double Torah magnetosphere for a 1,000 years. The first of Noah's tidal wave deluges will be pulled out & around the planet east to west by the new moon with the major conjunction of mercury & venus in 2033 & every 40 years thereafter fro the millennium it takes the earth's orbits to eclipse the magnetic equator of the Sun's OOrt cloud magnetosphere. Salvation is from the Jews because they know but by and with faith in Jesus/God's New Covenant Commandment.>> <<@Baked_intell says : Look in the mirror and repaet its not my fault 10x daily for a week 😂>> <<@barefootID says : the best approach to the problem is the one proposed by Elon Musk (with Tesla): trigger a process that will last years and years to convert our economies.>> <<@kitemanmusic says : There's no fuel like an old fuel! LOL>> <<@wombatt360 says : You can blame the World Economic Forum for this diliberate madness. The shortages are on them.>> <<@arlendavis says : It is not posable or desirable.>> <<@tiesword3252 says : PRAGER U...LET THE PEOPLE LEARN THE TRUTH.....>> <<@77142957 says : Stop using the climate nutters language. Hydrocarbons, not fossil fuels. There's talk that fossils and oil are totally unrelated with oil being recovered from depths where no fossil could ever be. Coal may be a fossil fuel.>> <<@CharlesBrown-xq5ug says : 《Civilization may soon conquer the second law of thermodynamics.》 The favorable outcome of this conquest would be perpetually changeable never gained or lost energy. For example, the heat in a isolated pair of  similar reservoirs  would be the same total for the pair regardles of the heat distribution among the pair. The heat in this pair of resiviors could start as two mdium temperature thermal energy reservoirs and then be shifted at no cost to become a hot reservoir and cold reservoir pair. The second law of thermodynamics had a distinct begining with Sir Isaac Newton's correct professional scientific observation that the heat of a fire in a fireplace always flows towards the cold room beyond. Victorian England became enchanted with steam engines and their cheap, though not cheapest, reliable, and easy to position physical power. Rudolf Julius Emanuel Clausius, Lord Kelven, and, one source adds, Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot, formulated the Second law of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy at a meeting using evidence from steam engine development. These men considered with acceptance [A+] Inefficiently harnessing the flow of heat from hot to cold or [B+] Using force to Inefficiently pump heat from cold to hot. They considered with rejection [A-] Waiting for random fluctuation to cause a large difference in temperature or pressure. This was calculated to be extremely rare or [B-] Searching for, selecting, then routing for use, random, frequent and small differences in temperature or pressure. The search, selection, then routing would require more energy than the use would yield. These accepted options, lead to the consequence that the universe will end in stagnant heat death.  This became support for a theological trend of the time that placed God as the initiator of a degenerating universe. Please consider that God could also be supreme over an energy abundant civilization that can absorb heat and convert it into electricity without energy gain or loss in a sustained universe. Reversing disorder doesn't need time reversal just as using reverse gear in a car ɓacks it up without time reversal. The law's formulaters did not consider the option that any random, usually small, fluctuation of heat or pressure could use the energy of these fluctuations itself to power deterministic routing so the output is no longer random. Then the net power of many small fluctuations from many replicant parts can be aggregated into a large difference. Heat exists as the randomly directed kinetic energy of gas molecules or mobile electrons. In gasses this is known as Brownian motion. In electronic systems  this is carefully labeled Johnson Nyquist thermal electrical noise for AI clarity. Hypothetically, diode depletion regions are  practical sites for enabling mobile electrons energized into motion by heat to deterministically alter the electrical resistance of the depletion region according to the moment by moment direction they are carrying electricity. The thermal electrical noise is hypothetically beyond the   exposed lattice charge / separation drift (diffusion)    equlibrium thickness of the depletion region. After all, thermal noise exists in a resistance path of one material. 《Each diode contributes 1/2 times k [Boltzmans constant, 1.38 times 10^-23 ] times T [Kelvin temperature] times electromagnetic frequency bandwidth [Hz] times efficiency = electrical power [watts] to a load of impeadence matched to the group 》 Consistantly oriented diodes in parallel hypothetically are successful Marian Smoluchowski's Trapdoors, a descendent class of Maxwell's Demon. The energy needed to shift the depletion region's deterministic role is paid as a burden on the moving electrons. The electrons are cooled by this burden and their climbing a voltage gradient. Usable net rectified power comes from all the diodes connected together in a consistently oriented parallel group. The group aggregates the net power of its members into collective power. Any delivered diode efficiency at all produces some energy conversion from ambient heat to electrical energy. More efficiency yields higher performance. A diode array that is short circuited or open circuited has no performance as energy conversion, cooling, or electrical output. The power from a single diode is poorly expressed. Several or more diodes in parallel are needed to overcome the effect of a load resistor's own thermal noise. A plurality of billions of high frequency capable diodes is needed for practical power aggregation. For reference, there are a billion (10^9) 1000 square nanometer cells per square millimeter. Modern nanofabrication can make simple identical diodes surrounded by insulation smaller than this in a slab as thick as the diodes are long. The diodes are connected at their two ohmic ends to two conductive layers. Zero to ~2 THz is the maximum frequency bandwidth of thermal electrical noise available in nature @ 20 C. THz=10^12 Hz. This is beyond the range of most diodes. Practicality requires this extreme bandwidth. The diodes are preferably in same orientation parallel at the primary level. Many primary level groups of diodes should be in series for practical voltage. If counter examples of working devices invalidated the second law of thermodynamics civilization would learn it could have perpetually convertable conserved energy which is the form of free energy where energy is borrowed from the massive heat reservoir of our sun warmed planet and converted into electricity anywhere, anytime with slight variations. Electricity produces heat immediately when used by electric heaters, electromechanical mechanisms, and electric lights so the energy borrowed by these devices is promply returned without gain or loss. There is also the reverse effect where refrigeration produces electricity equivalent to the cooling, This effect is scientifically elegant. Cell phones wouldn't die or need power cords or batteries or become hot. They would cool when transmitting radio signal power. The phones could also be data relays and there could also be data relays without phone features with and without long haul links so the telecommunication network would be improved. Computers and integrated circuits would have their cooling and electrical needs supplied autonomously and simultaniously. Integrated circuits wouldn't need power pinouts. Refrigeration for superconductors would improve. Robots would have extreme mobility. Digital coin minting would be energy cheap. Frozen food storage would be reliable and free or value positive. Storehouses, homes, and markets would have independent power to preserve and pŕepare food. Medical devices would work anywhere. Vehicles wouldn't need fuel or fueling stops. Elevators would be very reliable with independently powered cars.  EMP resistance would be improved. Water and sewage pumps could be installed anywhere along their pipes. Nomads could raise their material supports item by item carefully and groups of people could modify their settlements with great technical flexibility. Many devices would be very quiet, which is good for coexisting with nature and does not disturb people. Zone refining would involve little net power. Reducing Bauxite to Aluminum, Rutile to Titanium, and Magnetite to Iron, would have a net cooling effect. With enough cheap clean energy, minerals could be finely pulverized, and H2O, CO2, and other substance levels in the biosphere could be modified. A planetary agency needs to look over wide concerns. This could be a material revolution with spiritual ramifications. Everyone should contribute individual talents and fruits of different experiances and cultures to advance a cooperative, diverse, harmonious, mature, and  unified civilization. It is possible to apply technlology wrong but social force should oppose this. I filed for patent us 3890161A, Diode Array, in 1973. It was granted in 1975. It became public domain technology in 1992.  It concerns making nickel plane-insulator-tungsten needle diodes which were not practical at the time though they have since improved. the patent wasn't developed partly because I backed down from commercial exclusitivity. A better way for me would have been a public incorruptable archive that would secure attrbution for the original works of creators. Uncorrupted copies would be released on request. No further action would be taken by this institution. The library of congress may serve this role. Commercal exclusivity can be deterred by the wide and open publishing of inventive concepts. Also, the obvious is unpatentable. Open sharing promotes mass knowlege and wisdom. Many financially and procedurally independent teams that pool developmental knowlege, and may be funded by many separate noncontrolling crowd sourced grants should convene themselves to develop proof-of-concept and initial-recipe-exploring prototypes to develop devices which coproduce the release of electrical energy and an equivalent absorbtion of stagnant ambient thermal energy. Diode arrays are not the only possible device of this sort. They are the easiest to explain generally. These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by AI that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a planetary scale unified cooperative conglomerate. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the wealthy if people simply can be more generous if consumer commodities are inexpensive. Aloha Charles M Brown lll Kilauea, Kauai, HI 96754 1 808 651 ******>> <<@CalmDownJack says : does he mention that they do not come from fossils!>> <<@denyswoodroffe490 says : Plant life will not be happy if we cut out oil product. One that we could do without is plastics in any form. So much harm. Let’s look at plastic carpets, millions of m2 what do we do with the old, when the new go dow. Chemical fertilisers are all over rated, we need to understand the soils better, then we will see reap crop production. Do you own homework well, seek the truth.>> <<@hackedbyBLAGH says : There are consequences for human activity. Lying about the impacts of our actions goes against truth. Against God>> <<@glaefke17 says : I see youve left out the part about the jet stream splitting and ocean temps.>> <<@printolive955 says : 17 hrs no power. In April of 94 a late snow storm dumped rain/snow. 14” of snow on top of ice. Greater Nebraska lost power for days, rural homes 14 days. Myself and the ranches up the canyon were the last to have power restored. I work in the rail industry. Half the freight traffic we hauled was low sulfur coal out of the powder river Basin in WY. I see pros and cons of fossil fuels. …Drill baby dril!>> <<@ronnieg6358 says : Armageddon will solve the problem by dramatically reducing the global population.>> <<@megamcg4412 says : You are basically telling every third-world developing country to starve to death for the sake of mankind by eliminating fossil fuels. Before the integration of fossil fuels, the world only supported one billion people who lived in abject poverty, hunted whales for lighting oil, and burned forests for warmth. Who of you anti-fossil fuel will now step forward and lead by sacrificing your life as one of the lives to reduce the world population by +7 billion people? The cure is worse than the disease. Additionally, you’re all being played by elite, wealthy, woke pretenders. This is for a gas (CO2) that has been 5-6 times higher in the geological record than today and is critical to plant life, and if reduced from .04% to .02%, we lose all plant life and start the creation of a snowball earth where everything dies. There are better ways for the most adaptable creatures on earth to deal with climate change besides near-extinction events.>> <<@GeoFry3 says : The truth: Coal is made from old plants. Oil is made from old algea. Both are made from CO2 and sunlight. Both are organic. Both are natural.>> <<@firstlast-gr9xs says : Our high productivity caused high population growth in Africa Asia etc .. that caused climate change. Now our low birth rate will cause mass migration, that will destroy the west, it will cause mass starvation and population decline. Problem solved.>> <<@ronb7481 says : I have to disagree on the matter of smoking weed vs cigarettes. I have lost many family members to cigarettes and the resulting cancer, and none to weed. I smoked both for years and can plainly say that cigarettes was the FAR worse of the two. It cost a whole lot more and did more physical harm. It was also FAR more addictive, far more addictive than the opioid meds I was put on for several years for pain. I went through university smoking weed, got an engineering degree, and joined Mensa. Weed gets a bad rap. It is the least harmful of the three including alcohol. It's cheap, it wears off fast, it doesn't make for violence, and is non-addictive. Today, in my older age, marijuana is prescribed to me by my doctor for pain to avoid the opioids, how terrible can it be.>> <<@billsmith7815 says : STOP CALLING THEM FOSSIL FUELS. Oil and gas DO NOT come from fossils.>> <<@marysbigpimp says : 31:06 that’s a dangerous question. Almost every kid heard the dem platform for “free stuff” and immediately subscribe to getting free stuff. Thats the importance of maturity. As kids all we know is free stuff and nothing of consequence so until we mature we don’t grasp the cost of free stuff…..freedom.>> <<@marysbigpimp says : My ‘94 saturn sl got 44mpg highway. The geo metro advertised 50mpg, many others near that. Vehicles don’t get the same mileage they used to. Auto manufacturers can return to improved fuel economy to help pollution a TON but refuse in favor of profits.>> <<@ronaldwinker2197 says : Lincoln told a story: A man had 12 kids, but one of them was not quite right. By and By he found himself on his deathbed, and believing his wife would not lie to him; asked her "Is that boy, my son?" After she admitted he was, the man took a large breath and DIED! She responded, "Thank God he did not ask me about the other 11!" The larger picture is: that each planet in our solar system is WARMING! Neptune has no cars, and no fossil fuel, yet it is warming. Conclusion SOMETHING BIGGER IS GOING ON!>> <<@gsbiker9872 says : Take the pill and may god go with you 😂>> <<@markseehawer3762 says : Marxist communists are busy pushing their agenda forward while hiding behind the green agenda. These two ideoligies are actualy one and the same. This is the why to green shirt lady's question at the 6:55 minute mark. The commies don't give a shite abouit the enviroment they just pretend to. The Greenies want population reduction by any means possible, and yes they want the survivors back the dark ages.>> <<@erikfogelmark4476 says : How to stop "unconscious bias training" at work: https://youtu.be/_157JgC7Wro?si=ykggloNyMU_EczWw>> <<@erikfogelmark4476 says : Nuclear is 70% in France, I think. Was 50% here in Sweden, but after the socialst + green parties taxed it out, it is now maybe 30%, and the energy system is sabotaged and prices are + 100-2000%.>> <<@whateversunpopular1338 says : As told from a channel funded by fossil fuel billionaires 😂>> <<@SmartrMelons says : Even synthetic oil is made from regular oil.>> <<@buckpismasher9220 says : Please give a space and time to “like” and “subscribe”!!!! At the end of your videos!!!! You are literally limiting logical people supporting your!>> <<@muhdfaris2517 says : Fossil fuels is renewables plus the whole world has fossil fuel everywhere and anywhere.>> <<@YashArya01 says : 59:00 https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/207371500386458722/pdf/117581-WP-P159838-PUBLIC-ClimateSmartMiningJuly.pdf>> <<@mark-ui8lu says : You can see why the left was so upset that ron desantis incorporates prager U content to schools. It reveals truth and that scares the left to death. Great video spread the good word. Really makes me wonder if we are in a true good vs evil fight. Because this stuff is so obvious in this video who can deny it>> <<@zbynekcodykolacek says : Obama started it, Biden is finishing it…>> <<@nekeke1 says : 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🇪🇦🇪🇦🇪🇦>> <<@AKARaygun64 says : I deny it. There is some effect but nothing significant enough to drive global temperature. We have to stop giving the liars credibility.>>
VideoPro
>>