Dope Tech Episode 2

<<@FactsMatterRoman says : 🇺🇸Flash Sale: https://ept.ms/44nEGJZ 🎬 Watch the Full Episode 👉🏻 https://ept.ms/NuclearWaterRM 🍿 Watch Gotaways: The Hidden Border Crisis 👉🏻 https://ept.ms/3Kl9rXL 🧶 SUBSCRIBE for more videos 👍>> <<@Trump_Train says : MSNBC said we have nothing to worry about.>> <<@cvanscho says : Just as we see encouraging news that 100's of new nuclear plants are to be built all over the world, we get this piece of disinformation. Its fearmongering, and really doesn't help.>> <<@toms2298 says : dude dont know what he is talking about at all 😂>> <<@andrewc3551 says : Epoch time got more fund from Japan now>> <<@Nuke-MarsX says : That water is less radioactive than a airplane flight>> <<@plebicite3704 says : Fear mongering for that good good oil mone>> <<@imasonite says : no i didn't find this interesting.>> <<@BenjiSun says : The reality? Do you really think it's responsible to compare regular nuclear coolant wastewater with water that's been in a nuclear MELTDOWN? Do you, make the same comparison with Chernobyl? because that's what Fukushima is. It's not a working nuclear plant, it's 3 reactors that's gone through nuclear meltdown with exposed fuel in what's called an Elephant's foot. there was also multiple chemical explosions. And all you media meatheads are talking about "tritium levels" as if that's an equivalent comparison. The IAEA is not a neutral party. TEPCO defending IAEA's refusal to allow third party independent testing of Fukushima waters is not a neutral situation. The IAEA having no issues blocking third party for TEPCO makes it not a neutral party. Also, what's released isn't going to travel far, at least not anytime soon. Most of it is not going to disperse as easily. The radioactive particles are much heavier than water, and that means it'll just sink into the areas surrounding the power plant, and continue to breakdown there, and the bulk of what'll be affected are the coastlines north of there, as in the shallows from Sendai to Kushiro. Where are your facts here? Oh right, "white people say tritium, done.">> <<@TheReykjavik says : It is very annoying that of all the media I've seen on this, not a single presentation has bothered to give the level of radiation of the wastewater in context of background radiation in the ocean. Just the most basic facts are fully absent from the story.>> <<@theldraspneumonoultramicro405 says : China is dumping unfiltered nuclear waste water straight from the reactor into the ocean from multiple powerplants, the water from those is hundreds of times more radioactive. the water Japan is releasing is cleaner and safer then the ocean they dump it in. nuclear fearmongering seriously need to be made illegal and punishable.>> <<@marilynnorthrup6961 says : Is this contamination from the remains of the Three Mile Island disaster?>> <<@est.019gz7 says : What about the local fishing near Fukushima?>> <<@ericrbacher9371 says : The waste water in the USA is hot, but not radioactive. The water in Japan IS radioactive.>> <<@divadlived4892 says : Funny how you used “ nuclear waste water “ and not contaminated water. ??? Nice choice 😅f words ya just fell off the pedestal of being a good reporting source. The water is not bad and yes all plants do it. Its just the left over water that was used for steam ??? Boooo. Nuclear energy is literally the best renewable source available and you are fear mongering>> <<@rebeuhsin6410 says : It is not exactly the same exactly.>> <<@SB-kb4zz says : It's good. The sooner the human race destroys itself, the better.>> <<@rickcoona says : CHINA is Releasing 100 times more radioactive waste water with much higher levels than Japan ever did>> <<@zad08 says : Tritium is in such a minuet amount it has no impact on the environment. It is also produced in our upper atmosphere naturally.>> <<@daddyethan says : Things like this proved to be an excellent case study for how the media can manipulate sheeps minds>> <<@kwaiborku8751 says : These are not waste water, it is contaiminated and had contact with the core!>> <<@ElEheyeh says : The only nuclear element left in the water is tritium and there is less in the water they are releasing into the ocean than there is in Japans drinking water.>> <<@jimmyf.x.9526 says : You give such a wrong information that is so dangerous! Japan's water directly touched the radioactive material because the reactor had a meltdown. US's water is for cooling, it never in direct contact with the core.>> <<@leonardmiletello5245 says : I am not a proponent of nuclear energy until we have the technology to render the nuclear waste inert.>> <<@jfam7827 says : We're all being poisoned by the air we breathe the water we drink the food we eat They've contaminated just about everything..>> <<@mattphillips2844 says : Misleading reporting here. Controlled releases do occur, but they are permitted releases in very small quantities. The nasty stuff is generally allowed to decay first in holdup tanks to safe levels first or disposed of in other controlled means ( sealed drums etc). .What Roman failed to mention is that when you burn coal at a similar sized plant 10x the radiation is airborne released due to a radioactive isotope in coal. The bottom line is yes some is released but is better monitored and a whole lot more regulated and much less in quantity than many other types of power production. Not to mention the other comments here being correct about flying eating bananas and other activities that give you a lot more exposure. That is why this reporting is so misleading.>> <<@MattattackW says : Stop the nuclear alarmism>> <<@rosemarietolentino3218 says : Fighting global warming is not going to work to well if we are the only ones doing it.>> <<@R.O.T.C._SEEM says : I'm all in for some murloc>> <<@BradleyFiles says : ....but THAT'S MASSACHUSETTS!!>> <<@thesearchforterrestrialint7795 says : why worry about industrial pollution of the oceans? Revelation 8:8...fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;>> <<@gbear1005 says : Dilutionrate is trillions to one, not millions>> <<@dougcorwin3090 says : Not>> <<@kennethyork5393 says : And we're worried about the atmosphere and they're gonna do this to our drinking water.>> <<@gravitynewton4609 says : Nuclear is safer than coal>> <<@hef8147 says : And its still better and cleaner than coal.>> <<@williamvaughan1218 says : Tritiated water is the liest of our worries in today's world. A thousand times more dangerous materials come from coal power plants. And of course it takes coal to refine silicone into processor chips.>> <<@ovfree3939 says : Tritium has half life of 12.5 years and biological half life of around 10 days, not the end of the world people>> <<@paulskiye6930 says : Except the water in Fukushima is in direct contact with the radiation source: the core. Water released from most nuclear reactors are not in contact with fission material. I am not concerned about tritium. I have no faith in ALPS filtering all radioactive nuclei from the contaminated water>> <<@jonpatino6603 says : But the US is worried about cow farts>> <<@wendyhanson8488 says : We need some individual scientists who can run true tests and data to show us! We need someone like Erin Brockovich! Otherwise we soon going to see our grandkids moving to Mars>> <<@melodyshaw5229 says : I wish you could untell me that...something else to worry about😢>> <<@soonerdad3 says : The media doesn't care about facts and truth, all the care about is what they can convince people to believe>> <<@Anna-lo1sm says : Over 30 years +>> <<@Karma46819 says : What he is saying is wrong..>> <<@bjoburn7821 says : Toxic Nuclear Facilities Releases You Pay a High Price So does everyone else>> <<@lancemousel3457 says : Surprised mucky mucks in cape cod are not jumping up and down over this>> <<@astonalex says : It’s a shame people are still scared of nuclear energy. Cars kill thousands of people every month but nobody fears anything about them.>> <<@Kockafalva says : And 1000x more is released in China>> <<@ilonaupite609 says : We need to stop all nuclear power plants, we can not have meltdowns and when rivers that cool the reactors are gone,we will lose habitat on this planet. Because only 12 meltdowns can create enough pollution so we would lose ozone.>>